data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e8f7/5e8f7b2725319cc688cd9b29756e37fbcce8268a" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d85e/4d85e70a12981d2483a4092ea15f9cdca3d71a4c" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b51f/6b51f57e792ee11310154bcb231decd21176a107" alt=""
The latest frock, Butterick 9269, view b, the bodice in black linen/cotton blend and the skirt in stretch sateen snake, both fabrics are from Spotlight.
Purchased belt, as they say.
I scooped out the back and front necklines 1.5cm each, after looking at the pattern piece and thinking it looked as though they were too high. I think it was a good thing I did as it looks like the pattern illustration now. It would have been too high. I shortened the frock a lot. As drafted this frock would be nearly down to my ankles. After much pinning and photographing, I decided it looked best hemmed above the knee. I find it easier to decide hem length from photos rather than from looking in the mirror. Anyone else find that?
This is an unprinted pattern, and very fragile, so I traced it. Ugh. I hate tracing unmarked patterns. Trying to figure out which holes mean darts or are just grain line holes. No nice dark lines to trace over either. (I put sew-in interfacing over the pattern to trace).